Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

NCC SAMA

IMO: 9480150
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 22,773 t
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,773 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

107.4 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+0%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

741 t

CO₂ emitted

2,364 t

2,401 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,904 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

614 h

26 days, 7% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 107.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+35%)

52.8Ranks 1,278 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 54% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+0%)

7.93Ranks 730 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU25%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU6%

75% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,769 t).

Fuel burned laden

75%

25% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

6.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NCC SAMA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NCC SAMA
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NCC SAMA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+3%	−2%	−53%	+7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−9%	−8%	+18%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−14%	−10%	−1%	−10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+23%	+32%	−35%	+2%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+10%	+3%	+158%	−74%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+15%	+12%	+38%	+221%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.0 kn	−44%	−31%	+32%	−32%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	741	2,364	6,904	614	11.3	107.4	15.04	75%
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,516	4,765	14,580	1,234	11.8	104.0	14.03	66%
2023	not published	1,412	4,426	12,373	1,063	11.6	114.1	10.62	86%
2022	not published	1,675	5,263	12,553	1,140	11.0	133.4	11.76	87%
2021	not published	2,085	6,511	19,247	1,866	10.3	108.3	11.57	84%
2020	not published	738	2,311	7,465	680	11.0	98.9	44.13	–
2019	not published	465	1,453	5,426	479	11.3	85.8	13.74	–
2018	not published	630	1,975	4,115	445	9.3	153.2	20.28	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	15.04	15.04	+0%	730 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	14.03	16.73	−16%	520 of 1,274	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	10.62	16.23	−35%	260 of 1,314	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.76	16.06	−27%	378 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	11.57	16.69	−31%	299 of 1,343	ABS	C
2020	not published	44.13	16.16	+173%	1,211 of 1,312	ABS	C
2019	not published	13.74	17.32	−21%	425 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	20.28	17.14	+18%	813 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.