Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

NCC SAMA

IMO: 9480150
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 22,773 t
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,652 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

133

Chemical tanker median 84.6 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.1 (−27%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,675 t

CO₂ emitted

5,263 t

Distance sailed

12,553 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,140 h

48 days, 13% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 107 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+35%)

52.8Ranks 1,278 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 54% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+0%)

7.93Ranks 730 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU22%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

1,464 t

87% of all fuel; 13% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

454 t

8.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NCC SAMA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NCC SAMA
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NCC SAMA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+3%	−2%	−53%	+7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−9%	−8%	+18%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−14%	−10%	−1%	−10%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+23%	+32%	−35%	+2%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+10%	+3%	+158%	−74%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+15%	+12%	+38%	+221%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.0 kn	−44%	−31%	+32%	−32%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 44%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	741	2,364	6,904	614	11.3	107	15.0	75%
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,516	4,765	14,580	1,234	11.8	104	14.0	66%
2023	not published	1,412	4,426	12,373	1,063	11.6	114	10.6	86%
2022	not published	1,675	5,263	12,553	1,140	11.0	133	11.8	87%
2021	not published	2,085	6,511	19,247	1,866	10.3	108	11.6	84%
2020	not published	738	2,311	7,465	680	11.0	98.9	44.1	–
2019	not published	465	1,453	5,426	479	11.3	85.8	13.7	–
2018	not published	630	1,975	4,115	445	9.3	153	20.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	15.0	15.0	+0%	730 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2024	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	14.0	16.7	−16%	520 of 1,274	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	10.6	16.2	−35%	260 of 1,314	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.8	16.1	−27%	378 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	11.6	16.7	−31%	299 of 1,343	ABS	C
2020	not published	44.1	16.2	+173%	1,211 of 1,312	ABS	C
2019	not published	13.7	17.3	−21%	425 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	20.3	17.1	+18%	813 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.