Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SEA JAGUAR

IMO: 9482627
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 46,711 t
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.32 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 46,711 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

158.3 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.64

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+34%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

40.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,196 t

CO₂ emitted

13,177 t

13,383 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

26,513 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,498 h

104 days, 29% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 158.3 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+23%)

76.1Ranks 1,280 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 10.7 (−1%)

8.0Faster than 46% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+34%)

4.51Ranks 1,122 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU4%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,823 t).

Fuel burned laden

54%

46% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SEA JAGUAR
Oil tanker median

125.0150.0175.0200.0225.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEA JAGUAR
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEA JAGUAR
Oil tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−14%	−19%	+129%	−37%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+3.1 kn	+8%	+49%	−41%	+80%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	−2%	+15%	−36%	−11%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−5%	−5%	−0%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.7 kn	+3%	−26%	−24%	+6%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.3 kn	−18%	+48%	+98%	+6%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd	4,196	13,177	26,513	2,498	10.6	158.3	10.64	54%
2024	Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd	2,135	6,692	11,571	1,025	11.3	184.6	16.79	40%
2023	not published	3,365	10,593	19,713	2,403	8.2	170.7	9.35	57%
2022	not published	5,374	17,010	30,792	4,400	7.0	174.5	10.54	–
2021	not published	5,698	18,034	30,916	4,454	6.9	184.3	10.33	–
2020	not published	7,316	23,138	40,790	4,244	9.6	179.3	9.76	–
2019	not published	4,516	14,155	20,648	3,868	5.3	218.7	9.18	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd	10.64	7.95	+34%	1,122 of 1,665	ABS	A
2024	Pantheon Tankers Management Ltd	16.79	8.06	+108%	1,469 of 1,787	ABS	A
2023	not published	9.35	8.44	+11%	1,040 of 1,797	ABS	A
2022	not published	10.54	8.51	+24%	1,259 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	10.33	8.86	+17%	1,084 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	9.76	9.03	+8%	1,021 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	9.18	8.83	+4%	1,015 of 1,919	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.