Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NAVIG8 MARTINEZ

IMO: 9482847
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 27,537 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.06 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: KONSTANTIN JACOB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,537 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

109.3 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.42

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+56%)

Average speed

9.9 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

977 t

CO₂ emitted

3,056 t

3,104 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,934 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

898 h

37 days, 10% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 109.3 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−15%)

76.1Ranks 506 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 10.7 (−7%)

8.0Faster than 29% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.42 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+56%)

4.51Ranks 1,217 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU6%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,622 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NAVIG8 MARTINEZ
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NAVIG8 MARTINEZ
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NAVIG8 MARTINEZ
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−27%	−26%	+2,048%	−66%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	−2.5 kn	+46%	+17%	−99%	+325%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 46%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2022	+3.7 kn	+9%	+55%	+695%	–	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.9 kn	−29%	−47%	−10%	–	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	977	3,056	8,934	898	9.9	109.3	12.42	–
2024	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	62	199	416	42	9.9	149.0	36.76	–
2022	not published	3,692	11,528	36,139	2,926	12.4	102.2	8.64	–
2019	not published	426	1,339	4,544	524	8.7	93.8	96.70	–
2018	not published	664	2,077	5,031	432	11.6	132.0	6.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	12.42	7.95	+56%	1,217 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2024	TB Marine Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	36.76	8.06	+356%	1,694 of 1,787	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	8.64	8.51	+2%	1,006 of 1,961	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	6.52	8.86	−26%	500 of 1,779	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.