Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

FRONTIER HARVEST

IMO: 9487976
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 74,205 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 93,525 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

166

Bulk carrier median 92.4 kg/nm (+79%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.50 (−35%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.4 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,168 t

CO₂ emitted

13,039 t

Distance sailed

25,165 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,252 h

94 days, 26% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 216 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+161%)

61.0Ranks 3,600 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 10.7 (−7%)

8.8Faster than 29% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.10 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+15%)

4.80Ranks 2,311 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU34%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

829 t

6.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FRONTIER HARVEST
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FRONTIER HARVEST
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FRONTIER HARVEST
Bulk carrier median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+43%	+56%	+152%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 43%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+21%	+1%	−48%	–	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−31%	−27%	−58%	−29%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2022	+1.3 kn	+5%	+20%	+286%	−3%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−17%	−27%	+64%	−49%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+27%	+16%	−86%	+129%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,710	8,474	12,549	1,249	10.0	216	9.10	–
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	750	2,347	4,973	540	9.2	151	–	–
2023	not published	1,206	3,761	9,653	873	11.1	125	4.46	–
2022	not published	4,177	13,041	23,093	2,215	10.4	181	6.27	–
2020	not published	1,035	3,237	5,980	660	9.1	173	6.46	–
2019	not published	764	2,393	3,645	354	10.3	210	12.7	–
2018	not published	4,168	13,039	25,165	2,252	11.2	166	5.54	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	9.10	7.90	+15%	2,311 of 3,611	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	4.46	8.27	−46%	241 of 3,548	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	6.27	8.71	−28%	825 of 3,968	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	6.46	8.24	−22%	803 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	12.7	8.38	+51%	2,762 of 3,360	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	5.54	8.50	−35%	521 of 3,384	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.