Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CHAMPION ISTRA

IMO: 9489209
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 34,969 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,489 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

109

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.96

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (−42%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,269 t

CO₂ emitted

10,265 t

Distance sailed

29,883 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,588 h

108 days, 30% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 96.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+21%)

52.8Ranks 1,111 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 11.1 (+7%)

8.8Faster than 77% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.61 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−43%)

7.93Ranks 220 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU47%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

653 t

6.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CHAMPION ISTRA
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHAMPION ISTRA
Chemical tanker median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHAMPION ISTRA
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−9%	−6%	−78%	−18%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+2%	−2%	+383%	+37%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−5%	+2%	−81%	−26%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+4%	−1%	+63%	+23%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	−8%	−4%	−26%	−12%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+24%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+0%	+1%	−3%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	864	2,703	8,978	752	11.9	96.2	8.61	–
2024	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	4,312	13,489	41,012	3,537	11.6	105	10.5	–
2023	not published	877	2,737	8,483	700	12.1	103	7.66	–
2022	not published	4,842	15,195	44,711	3,954	11.3	108	10.4	–
2021	not published	2,849	8,937	27,465	2,296	12.0	104	8.43	–
2020	not published	4,173	13,160	37,096	3,244	11.4	113	9.57	–
2019	not published	3,269	10,265	29,883	2,588	11.5	109	9.96	–
2018	not published	3,359	10,517	30,693	2,681	11.4	109	9.36	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	8.61	15.0	−43%	220 of 1,460	DNV	A+C
2024	ASP SHIP MANAGEMENT SINGAPORE PTE LTD	10.5	16.7	−37%	282 of 1,274	DNV	A
2023	not published	7.66	16.2	−53%	59 of 1,314	DNV	A
2022	not published	10.4	16.1	−35%	245 of 1,409	DNV	A
2021	not published	8.43	16.7	−49%	75 of 1,343	DNV	A
2020	not published	9.57	16.2	−41%	147 of 1,312	DNV	A
2019	not published	9.96	17.3	−42%	172 of 1,321	DNV	A
2018	not published	9.36	17.1	−45%	126 of 1,294	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.