Navalyze · Container · Ship

SOUTH

IMO: 9491472
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,617 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: AMERDIJK, ESPOIR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: m.s. Espoir Bewaarder B.V.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,028 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.4

Container median 178 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+67%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,884 t

CO₂ emitted

15,442 t

Distance sailed

53,436 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,810 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−48%)

78.8Ranks 426 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 13.3 (−25%)

9.1Faster than 15% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 37.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+133%)

7.22Ranks 1,846 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU5%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,220 t

7.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SOUTH
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SOUTH
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SOUTH
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	+6%	−17%	+1%	+40%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−8%	−13%	−53%	−3%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.3 kn	+3%	+23%	+26%	−13%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+13%	+7%	+16%	−18%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+2%	+7%	+3%	+9%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.3 kn	+8%	+37%	−24%	+51%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.7 kn	−21%	−44%	−5%	−13%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	m.s. Espoir Bewaarder B.V.	2,616	8,248	28,683	2,941	9.8	91.2	39.2	–
2025	CMA CGM SA	2,944	9,282	32,145	3,219	10.0	91.6	37.9	10%
2024	m.s. Espoir Bewaarder B.V.	2,748	8,798	31,730	2,512	12.6	86.6	27.1	–
2023	not published	6,341	20,330	67,473	5,049	13.4	94.0	28.0	–
2022	not published	4,884	15,442	53,436	4,810	11.1	91.4	32.0	–
2021	not published	3,739	11,889	46,077	3,935	11.7	81.1	39.0	–
2020	not published	3,564	11,258	44,778	4,021	11.1	79.6	35.9	–
2019	not published	4,348	13,711	59,124	6,699	8.8	73.5	23.8	–
2018	not published	5,818	18,345	62,210	4,971	12.5	93.5	27.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	m.s. Espoir Bewaarder B.V.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	CMA CGM SA	37.9	16.3	+133%	1,846 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	m.s. Espoir Bewaarder B.V.	27.1	17.5	+55%	1,386 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	28.0	19.4	+44%	1,295 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	32.0	19.1	+67%	1,338 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	39.0	17.9	+118%	1,469 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	35.9	17.6	+104%	1,420 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	23.8	18.9	+26%	1,091 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	27.4	20.2	+35%	1,112 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.