Navalyze · Container · Ship

NORTH

IMO: 9491501
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,238 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ESCAPE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: m.s. Escape Bewaarder B.V.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,038 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

89.6

Container median 174 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

35.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+86%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,130 t

CO₂ emitted

19,320 t

Distance sailed

68,443 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,137 h

256 days, 70% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−47%)

78.8Ranks 446 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 33% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 40.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+150%)

7.22Ranks 1,890 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports44%
From the EU40%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

893 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORTH
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORTH
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORTH
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+15%	+9%	−8%	+48%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−6%	−3%	−7%	−17%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	+3%	+8%	−0%	−16%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−5%	−9%	+2%	+22%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+0%	+3%	−35%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−3%	+6%	−2%	−12%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	−7%	−23%	+2%	–	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	m.s. Escape Bewaarder B.V.	2,074	6,543	20,497	1,633	12.6	101	46.2	–
2025	CMA CGM SA	3,505	11,129	37,670	3,081	12.2	93.0	40.8	38%
2024	m.s. Escape Bewaarder B.V.	3,292	10,549	40,865	3,167	12.9	80.6	27.6	–
2023	not published	3,740	11,974	43,830	3,493	12.5	85.3	33.2	–
2022	not published	3,653	11,591	43,896	3,688	11.9	83.2	39.5	–
2021	not published	3,775	11,908	43,154	3,467	12.4	87.5	32.2	–
2020	not published	5,814	18,334	66,740	5,484	12.2	87.1	30.8	–
2019	not published	6,130	19,320	68,443	6,137	11.2	89.6	35.1	–
2018	not published	6,462	20,361	67,390	4,979	13.5	95.9	25.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	m.s. Escape Bewaarder B.V.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	CMA CGM SA	40.8	16.3	+150%	1,890 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	m.s. Escape Bewaarder B.V.	27.6	17.5	+58%	1,398 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	33.2	19.4	+71%	1,415 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	39.5	19.1	+106%	1,478 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	32.2	17.9	+80%	1,352 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	30.8	17.6	+75%	1,350 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	35.1	18.9	+86%	1,346 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.