Navalyze · Container · Ship

BUDAPEST BRIDGE

IMO: 9494280
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 21,671 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EIV 16.61 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 24,174 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

188

Container median 182 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+20%)

Average speed

15.0 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

67.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,530 t

CO₂ emitted

51,649 t

Distance sailed

87,744 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,859 h

244 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,781 container ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 166 kg/nm · median 186 (−10%)

80.1Ranks 807 of 1,781, lowest first325

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 14.1 (−7%)

10.7Faster than 37% of container ships16.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.9 (+36%)

7.81Ranks 1,161 of 1,781, lowest first50.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU35%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

899 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BUDAPEST BRIDGE
Container median

160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Average speed, kn

BUDAPEST BRIDGE
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BUDAPEST BRIDGE
Container median

16.018.020.022.024.026.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−5%	−12%	−48%	+38%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	+7%	+19%	+6%	+5%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	−14%	−26%	−14%	−31%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2021	not published	6,915	21,942	41,581	3,174	13.1	166	24.4	–
2020	not published	13,935	44,190	79,955	5,632	14.2	174	17.6	–
2019	not published	12,248	38,539	75,257	5,906	12.7	163	16.9	–
2018	not published	16,530	51,649	87,744	5,859	15.0	188	24.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2021	not published	24.4	17.9	+36%	1,161 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	17.6	17.6	+0%	904 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	16.9	18.9	−11%	778 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	24.4	20.2	+20%	1,021 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.