Navalyze · Container · Ship

YM EVOLUTION

IMO: 9496460
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 26,049 t
Flag (estimated): Taiwan
Port of registry: Keelung
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation · part of Yang Ming

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 32,130 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

140

Container median 172 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−22%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

40.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,848 t

CO₂ emitted

30,959 t

Distance sailed

70,232 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,810 h

242 days, 66% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 157 kg/nm · median 177 (−11%)

78.8Ranks 976 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.3 (−1%)

9.1Faster than 47% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+15%)

7.22Ranks 1,270 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU48%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,300 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

YM EVOLUTION
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

YM EVOLUTION
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

YM EVOLUTION
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+7%	+15%	−87%	+15%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	−12%	−21%	−41%	−11%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.1 kn	−5%	−17%	−8%	−7%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	+9%	+27%	+32%	+22%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	+15%	+27%	−16%	+19%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−14%	−18%	−9%	−16%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−4.0 kn	−17%	−37%	−17%	−21%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation	857	2,652	5,447	414	13.2	157	18.7	–
2024	Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation	6,182	19,257	42,131	3,441	12.2	147	16.3	–
2023	not published	11,908	37,240	71,094	5,261	13.5	168	18.4	–
2022	not published	13,658	42,585	77,662	4,988	15.6	176	19.9	–
2021	not published	9,489	29,687	58,873	4,407	13.4	161	16.3	–
2020	not published	9,848	30,959	70,232	5,810	12.1	140	13.7	–
2019	not published	12,523	39,356	76,995	6,056	12.7	163	16.4	–
2018	not published	18,210	57,023	92,543	5,538	16.7	197	20.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation	18.7	16.3	+15%	1,270 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation	16.3	17.5	−7%	910 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	18.4	19.4	−5%	889 of 1,899	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	19.9	19.1	+4%	933 of 1,825	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	16.3	17.9	−9%	805 of 1,781	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	13.7	17.6	−22%	640 of 1,797	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	16.4	18.9	−13%	740 of 1,788	DNV	A+C
2018	not published	20.8	20.2	+3%	881 of 1,705	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.