Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

HEDY LAMARR

IMO: 9498743
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 26.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

211

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+36%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,705

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+200%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

1,705

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (+666%)

Average speed

17.7 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

89.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,321 t

CO₂ emitted

54,270 t

Distance sailed

82,232 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,646 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 153 kg/nm · median 150 (+2%)

69.3Ranks 213 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 19.1 kn · median 15.8 (+21%)

12.0Faster than 78% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 150 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−74%)

66.8Ranks 107 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 113 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−55%)

48.6Ranks 106 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU1%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,310 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HEDY LAMARR
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HEDY LAMARR
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

HEDY LAMARR
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

HEDY LAMARR
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−1%	+2%	+4%	−58%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−13%	−14%	−9%	+87%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+3%	+4%	+19%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	+13%	+116%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+1%	+4%	+12%	−30%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−16%	−14%	−27%	−90%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.2 kn	+11%	−6%	−7%	+19%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	13,175	38,398	86,409	4,513	19.1	153	–	–
2024LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	12,833	36,389	82,965	4,472	18.6	155	–	–
2023	not published	16,242	50,201	91,161	4,847	18.8	178	–	–
2022	not published	13,179	41,140	76,381	4,100	18.6	173	–	–
2021	not published	12,008	37,539	67,386	3,606	18.7	178	–	–
2020	not published	10,598	33,151	60,229	3,310	18.2	176	–	–
2019	not published	17,321	54,270	82,232	4,646	17.7	211	–	–
2018	not published	16,849	52,648	88,444	4,231	20.9	191	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	150	567	−74%	107 of 408	113	253	−55%	RINA	A+B+C
2024LNG	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	358	547	−34%	155 of 404	21.7	233	−91%	RINA	A+B+C
2023	not published	192	680	−72%	94 of 386	130	234	−45%	RINA	–
2022	not published	264	626	−58%	118 of 394	129	253	−49%	RINA	B
2021	not published	122	815	−85%	76 of 377	122	226	−46%	RINA	B
2020	not published	173	751	−77%	93 of 387	137	217	−37%	RINA	B
2019	not published	1,705	569	+200%	358 of 394	1,705	223	+666%	RINA	B
2018	not published	1,431	729	+96%	264 of 361	5,053	184	+2,645%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.