Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

HYPATIA DE ALEJANDRIA

IMO: 9498755
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

158

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

344

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−54%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

251

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (+15%)

Average speed

18.3 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,294 t

CO₂ emitted

44,262 t

Distance sailed

96,612 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,270 h

220 days, 60% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 154 kg/nm · median 150 (+3%)

69.3Ranks 217 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 19.6 kn · median 15.8 (+24%)

12.0Faster than 82% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 112 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−80%)

66.8Ranks 81 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 162 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−36%)

48.6Ranks 150 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports100%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

142 t

0.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HYPATIA DE ALEJANDRIA
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HYPATIA DE ALEJANDRIA
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.019.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

HYPATIA DE ALEJANDRIA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

HYPATIA DE ALEJANDRIA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.2 kn	−1%	+11%	−3%	−82%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+3%	+8%	+22%	+21%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−13%	−15%	−11%	−22%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+10%	+1%	−6%	+61%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	+2%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−10%	−7%	−2%	−88%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	14,993	44,530	97,232	4,949	19.6	154	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	15,639	46,520	99,927	5,733	17.4	157	–	–
2023	not published	12,498	38,012	82,243	4,942	16.6	152	–	–
2022	not published	16,174	50,488	92,220	5,415	17.0	175	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15,707	45,909	98,386	5,335	18.4	160	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	15,294	44,262	96,612	5,270	18.3	158	–	–
2019	not published	17,351	53,308	98,194	5,578	17.6	177	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	112	567	−80%	81 of 408	162	253	−36%	RINA	A+B
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	606	547	+11%	215 of 404	3.32	233	−99%	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	503	680	−26%	154 of 386	213	234	−9%	RINA	–
2022	not published	645	626	+3%	202 of 394	245	253	−3%	RINA	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	400	815	−51%	134 of 377	235	226	+4%	RINA	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	344	751	−54%	123 of 387	251	217	+15%	RINA	B
2019	not published	2,886	569	+407%	376 of 394	2,886	223	+1,197%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.