Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ADAM LNG

IMO: 9501186
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Oman Ship Management Company SAOC

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

258

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

25.7

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+148%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,806 t

CO₂ emitted

29,904 t

Distance sailed

41,872 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,321 h

138 days, 38% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 213 kg/nm · median 205 (+4%)

148Ranks 177 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 14.6 (−5%)

11.0Faster than 38% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.55 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (−25%)

4.54Ranks 79 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU54%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

538 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ADAM LNG
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ADAM LNG
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ADAM LNG
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−12%	−17%	−46%	−21%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−7%	+10%	−25%	−73%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+6.3 kn	+1%	+102%	+73%	−17%	6.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−9.6 kn	+13%	−55%	−24%	+5%	9.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+0.5 kn	−9%	−6%	+62%	+79%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Oman Ship Management Company SAOC	3,611	9,958	16,988	1,224	13.9	213	–	72%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7,590	20,955	31,503	2,127	14.8	241	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,806	29,904	41,872	3,321	12.6	258	–	–
2021	not published	6,158	18,195	24,210	3,821	6.3	254	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7,224	20,061	31,960	2,007	15.9	226	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	4,924	13,990	19,723	1,282	15.4	250	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Oman Ship Management Company SAOC	5.55	7.39	−25%	79 of 312	ABS	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7.05	9.10	−23%	111 of 355	ABS	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	25.7	10.4	+148%	338 of 379	ABS	C
2021	not published	31.0	10.5	+196%	273 of 289	ABS	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	29.5	10.7	+175%	260 of 267	ABS	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	16.5	10.9	+51%	173 of 197	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.