Navalyze · Other · Ship

HILKE

IMO: 9501875
Type: Other ship types
Average cargo carried: 1,717 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EIV 24.07 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PALABORA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Harren & Partner Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS “HILKE”

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

84.7

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+54%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

52.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+113%)

Average speed

13.9 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+30%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,968 t

CO₂ emitted

12,493 t

Distance sailed

46,833 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,358 h

140 days, 38% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 75.7 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+4%)

42.2Ranks 105 of 189, lowest first142

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 11.1 (+32%)

8.5Faster than 90% of other ships14.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 137 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.6 (+167%)

21.3Ranks 139 of 189, lowest first306

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU32%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

516 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HILKE
Other median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

HILKE
Other median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

HILKE
Other median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	−10%	−1%	−34%	−1%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	+3%	+2%	−3%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+1%	−2%	+104%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−5%	−6%	−76%	−48%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+2%	+9%	+9%	+56%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	−10%	+2%	+70%	−55%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Harren & Partner Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS “HILKE”	1,097	3,422	14,502	994	14.6	75.7	137	–
2023	not published	1,842	5,769	21,948	1,650	13.3	83.9	139	–
2022	not published	1,844	5,846	22,730	1,687	13.5	81.2	90.5	–
2021	not published	892	2,795	11,129	800	13.9	80.2	–	–
2020	not published	3,968	12,493	46,833	3,358	13.9	84.7	–	–
2019	not published	3,566	11,166	42,816	3,288	13.0	83.3	–	–
2018	not published	2,335	7,315	25,150	2,188	11.5	92.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Harren & Partner Schiffahrts GmbH & Co. KG MS “HILKE”	137	51.6	+167%	139 of 189	EnvService	C
2023	not published	139	93.5	+49%	74 of 116	Swiss Climate	C
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	27.3	22.7	+20%	786 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	52.1	24.5	+113%	1,063 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	33.5	25.0	+34%	838 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	73.9	24.9	+197%	978 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.