Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK EMERALD

IMO
9502910
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
87,371 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EIV 11.49 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 61,426 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
339
Container median 172 kg/nm (+97%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
17.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−1%)
Average speed
16.5 kn
Container median 14.0 kn (+18%)
Fuel per day at sea
134.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
11,755 t
CO₂ emitted
37,057 t
Distance sailed
34,631 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,096 h
87 days, 24% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 275 kg/nm · median 178 (+55%)
77.9Ranks 1,425 of 1,825, lowest first314
Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.6 (−5%)
10.1Faster than 40% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.79 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (−49%)
7.44Ranks 310 of 1,825, lowest first52.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports16%
  • From the EU37%
  • Into the EU46%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
534 t
1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MAERSK EMERALD
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MAERSK EMERALD
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MAERSK EMERALD
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022+0.5 kn−18%−15%+144%−38%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−4.1 kn−1%−26%−71%−10%4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+3.2 kn+12%+40%−37%+18%3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−3.0 kn+2%−17%+1,720%−53%3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published6,69520,84924,3741,88812.92759.79–
2021not published3,34610,5439,99280312.433515.7–
2020not published11,75537,05734,6312,09616.533917.4–
2019not published16,64151,85354,9604,14413.330314.8–
2018not published8932,7883,01918516.329631.2–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published9.7919.1−49%310 of 1,825DNVB
2021not published15.717.9−12%762 of 1,781DNVB
2020not published17.417.6−1%881 of 1,797DNVB
2019not published14.818.9−22%640 of 1,788DNVB
2018not published31.220.2+54%1,194 of 1,705DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.