Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

ARC COMMITMENT

IMO: 9505039
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,407 t
Flag (estimated): United States
Port of registry: Wilmington, De
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TIGER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier, LLC

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,653 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

121

Vehicle carrier median 103 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

145

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 56.6 (+156%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.5 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,161 t

CO₂ emitted

3,687 t

Distance sailed

9,575 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

670 h

28 days, 8% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 105 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+5%)

79.6Ranks 335 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

12.0Faster than 59% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 61.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+11%)

34.7Ranks 286 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU3%
Into the EU77%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

262 t

7.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARC COMMITMENT
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARC COMMITMENT
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ARC COMMITMENT
Vehicle carrier median

25.050.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−16%	−21%	+52%	+30%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	+3%	+14%	+103%	−67%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+2.5 kn	−7%	+13%	−62%	+127%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.4 kn	−10%	−35%	+57%	−10%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	+14%	+21%	−52%	+16%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−12%	−12%	+1%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+1%	+5%	−39%	+36%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier, LLC	3,116	9,832	29,581	2,012	14.7	105	61.5	–
2024	American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier, LLC	2,432	7,700	19,446	1,234	15.8	125	47.4	–
2023	not published	1,161	3,687	9,575	670	14.3	121	145	–
2022	not published	3,314	10,429	25,423	2,159	11.8	130	63.9	–
2021	not published	2,358	7,460	16,195	997	16.2	146	71.2	–
2020	not published	4,270	13,419	33,445	2,191	15.3	128	61.6	–
2019	not published	4,768	14,980	33,030	2,150	15.4	144	62.5	–
2018	not published	7,654	23,956	53,831	3,606	14.9	142	46.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier, LLC	61.5	55.4	+11%	286 of 506	DNV	A+C
2024	American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier, LLC	47.4	55.3	−14%	116 of 335	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	145	56.6	+156%	386 of 417	DNV	A+B+C
2022	not published	63.9	57.7	+11%	274 of 463	DNV	C
2021	not published	71.2	59.6	+19%	309 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	61.6	57.3	+8%	252 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	62.5	59.0	+6%	241 of 426	DNV	C
2018	not published	46.1	62.4	−26%	43 of 434	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.