Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

FIGARO

IMO: 9505041
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 11,336 t
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Stockholm
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.86 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: WALL RO/RO AB

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,244 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

132

Vehicle carrier median 108 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

78.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 57.7 (+36%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,562 t

CO₂ emitted

8,005 t

Distance sailed

19,424 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,382 h

58 days, 16% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 134 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+34%)

79.6Ranks 492 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 75% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−34%)

34.7Ranks 65 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU24%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

664 t

8.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FIGARO
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FIGARO
Vehicle carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FIGARO
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+8%	+6%	−39%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−11%	−9%	+224%	−32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	+6%	+15%	−29%	−19%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	+2%	+8%	+79%	+62%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	+9%	+0%	−74%	+14%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−13%	−20%	−12%	−6%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+11%	+13%	+13%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	WALL RO/RO AB	3,627	11,262	27,020	1,764	15.3	134	36.8	–
2024	WALL RO/RO AB	5,535	17,266	44,586	2,855	15.6	124	43.3	–
2023	not published	1,919	5,999	13,753	902	15.3	140	63.8	–
2022	not published	2,562	8,005	19,424	1,382	14.1	132	78.6	–
2021	not published	1,402	4,418	10,879	816	13.3	129	48.4	–
2020	not published	4,943	15,493	41,996	2,894	14.5	118	42.5	–
2019	not published	6,517	20,449	47,976	3,060	15.7	136	45.3	–
2018	not published	5,194	16,273	42,636	2,751	15.5	122	47.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	WALL RO/RO AB	36.8	55.4	−34%	65 of 506	DNV	C
2024	WALL RO/RO AB	43.3	55.3	−22%	79 of 335	DNV	C
2023	not published	63.8	56.6	+13%	267 of 417	DNV	C
2022	not published	78.6	57.7	+36%	347 of 463	Lloyd's Register	C
2021	not published	48.4	59.6	−19%	120 of 459	Lloyd's Register	C
2020	not published	42.5	57.3	−26%	66 of 449	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2019	not published	45.3	59.0	−23%	58 of 426	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	47.5	62.4	−24%	57 of 434	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.