Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

BWEK TAHITI

IMO: 9506186
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,233 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.96 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ESHIPS DANA, TRISTAR DANA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ESHIPS LPG 1 LTD

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,713 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

56.4

Gas carrier (LPG) median 91.1 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

104

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 45.9 (+127%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 10.4 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,329 t

CO₂ emitted

13,675 t

Distance sailed

76,783 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,078 h

253 days, 69% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 54.0 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−34%)

49.8Ranks 46 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 12.6 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 39% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 138 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+288%)

14.4Ranks 329 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports88%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

2,251 t

52% of all fuel; 48% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,642 t

12.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BWEK TAHITI
Gas carrier (LPG) median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BWEK TAHITI
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BWEK TAHITI
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	+1%	+23%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−12%	−15%	+5%	−14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+14%	+14%	−32%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+8%	+0%	−3%	+37%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−7%	−5%	−1%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−1%	+2%	−13%	−1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−8%	−10%	+38%	−9%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	ESHIPS LPG 1 LTD	1,192	3,746	21,148	1,718	12.3	56.4	153	81%
2025	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	2,516	7,929	46,570	3,878	12.0	54.0	138	68%
2024	ESHIPS LPG 1 LTD	2,628	8,260	46,326	3,952	11.7	56.7	112	87%
2023	not published	2,816	8,834	43,924	3,595	12.2	64.1	131	82%
2022	not published	3,610	11,406	64,192	5,248	12.2	56.2	132	40%
2021	not published	3,425	10,847	66,127	4,987	13.3	51.8	96.4	50%
2020	not published	3,724	11,787	67,005	5,128	13.1	55.6	103	52%
2019	not published	4,329	13,675	76,783	6,078	12.6	56.4	104	52%
2018	not published	3,412	10,788	55,791	4,323	12.9	61.1	114	55%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	ESHIPS LPG 1 LTD	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2025	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	138	35.6	+288%	329 of 355	ABS	B+C
2024	ESHIPS LPG 1 LTD	112	35.8	+213%	269 of 306	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	131	41.8	+213%	297 of 330	ABS	C
2022	not published	132	42.5	+211%	324 of 348	ABS	C
2021	not published	96.4	46.9	+106%	259 of 323	ABS	C
2020	not published	103	42.3	+144%	279 of 339	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	104	45.9	+127%	278 of 331	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	114	53.1	+114%	239 of 297	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.