Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CIUDAD DE BARCELONA

IMO
9506289
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EIV 24.64 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
VOLCAN DEL TEIDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
242
Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (+58%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
724
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+6%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
693
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (+196%)
Average speed
18.3 kn
Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+14%)
Fuel per day at sea
105.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
14,144 t
CO₂ emitted
44,183 t
Distance sailed
58,502 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,204 h
134 days, 37% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 233 kg/nm · median 150 (+55%)
69.3Ranks 368 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 17.2 kn · median 15.8 (+9%)
12.0Faster than 64% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 355 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−37%)
66.8Ranks 158 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 397 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+57%)
48.6Ranks 249 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports91%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU9%
  • At berth in the EU0%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0 t
0.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CIUDAD DE BARCELONA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • CIUDAD DE BARCELONA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CIUDAD DE BARCELONA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • CIUDAD DE BARCELONA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.2 kn−5%−6%+23%+20%Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−0.9 kn+1%−3%+10%−59%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+1.4 kn−0%+8%−0%+100%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−2.9 kn−2%−17%−43%−67%2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.9 kn−0%−5%+3%+96%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.1 kn−4%−3%+3%+8%Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+0.8 kn+1%+5%−8%−87%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL18,51758,00379,4194,62717.2233––
2024TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL15,82649,44964,4913,69717.4245––
2023not published14,14444,18358,5023,20418.3242––
2022not published14,19444,29558,6153,46916.9242––
2021not published25,44079,354102,5615,17419.8248––
2020not published24,71077,09199,3624,79220.7249––
2019not published25,00777,90596,7684,70420.6258––
2018not published26,69183,145104,6855,27419.8255––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL355567−37%158 of 408397253+57%RINAA
2024TRASMED GLE SL UNIPERSONAL295547−46%141 of 404495233+113%RINAA
2023not published724680+6%210 of 386693234+196%RINAA
2022not published363626−42%141 of 394782253+209%RINAA
2021not published1,102815+35%249 of 377853226+277%RINAB
2020not published562751−25%164 of 387527217+142%Bureau VeritasA+B
2019not published523569−8%184 of 394523223+135%Bureau VeritasA+B
2018not published4,103729+463%339 of 361549184+198%Bureau VeritasA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.