Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ARINDA JOY

IMO: 9512422
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 5,637 t
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.48 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Former names: WHITE EAGLE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Joy Marine Company

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,637 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

49.3 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+40%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

27.65

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+9%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

884 t

CO₂ emitted

2,797 t

2,841 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,906 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,061 h

86 days, 24% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 49.3 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+40%)

17.4Ranks 1,856 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.7 kn · median 9.3 (−6%)

7.0Faster than 34% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.65 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+9%)

10.14Ranks 1,556 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU40%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU10%

65% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,814 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

10.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ARINDA JOY
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARINDA JOY
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ARINDA JOY
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+6%	+0%	−1%	+31%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−5%	−2%	+3%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−4%	−6%	−26%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−17%	−5%	+44%	−5%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.4 kn	+38%	+6%	−28%	−57%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 38%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−9%	+25%	+24%	+3%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−1%	+3%	+27%	+88%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Joy Marine Company	884	2,797	17,906	2,061	8.7	49.3	27.71	–
2024	Joy Marine Company	842	2,667	18,102	1,964	9.2	46.5	21.74	–
2023	not published	861	2,719	17,600	1,965	9.0	48.9	24.87	–
2022	not published	1,212	3,833	23,680	2,604	9.1	51.2	31.20	–
2021	not published	1,019	3,221	16,453	2,069	8.0	61.9	33.95	–
2020	not published	1,018	3,228	22,722	2,194	10.4	44.8	–	–
2019	not published	899	2,828	18,304	2,428	7.5	49.1	–	–
2018	not published	719	2,270	14,461	1,999	7.2	49.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Joy Marine Company	27.65	25.45	+9%	1,556 of 2,706	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2024	Joy Marine Company	21.09	19.25	+10%	631 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	24.32	20.67	+18%	674 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	30.68	21.57	+42%	778 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	32.21	22.70	+42%	912 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	74.97	24.50	+206%	1,121 of 1,167	DNV	C
2019	not published	72.59	24.96	+191%	1,092 of 1,154	DNV	C
2018	not published	38.63	24.89	+55%	815 of 1,044	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.