Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ARINDA JOY

IMO: 9512422
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 5,637 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.48 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Former names: WHITE EAGLE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Joy Marine Company

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,188 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

51.2

General cargo median 57.3 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 21.6 (+42%)

Average speed

9.1 kn

General cargo median 10.8 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,212 t

CO₂ emitted

3,833 t

Distance sailed

23,680 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,604 h

109 days, 30% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 49.3 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+40%)

17.4Ranks 1,873 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.7 kn · median 9.3 (−6%)

6.9Faster than 35% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 27.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+8%)

10.2Ranks 1,560 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU34%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

301 t

7.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARINDA JOY
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARINDA JOY
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ARINDA JOY
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+6%	+0%	−1%	+31%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−5%	−2%	+3%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−4%	−6%	−26%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−17%	−5%	+44%	−5%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.4 kn	+38%	+6%	−28%	−57%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 38%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−9%	+25%	+24%	+3%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−1%	+3%	+27%	+88%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Joy Marine Company	884	2,797	17,906	2,061	8.7	49.3	27.7	–
2024	Joy Marine Company	842	2,667	18,102	1,964	9.2	46.5	21.7	–
2023	not published	861	2,719	17,600	1,965	9.0	48.9	24.9	–
2022	not published	1,212	3,833	23,680	2,604	9.1	51.2	31.2	–
2021	not published	1,019	3,221	16,453	2,069	8.0	61.9	34.0	–
2020	not published	1,018	3,228	22,722	2,194	10.4	44.8	–	–
2019	not published	899	2,828	18,304	2,428	7.5	49.1	–	–
2018	not published	719	2,270	14,461	1,999	7.2	49.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Joy Marine Company	27.7	25.5	+8%	1,560 of 2,723	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	–
2024	Joy Marine Company	21.1	19.3	+10%	631 of 1,111	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2023	not published	24.3	20.7	+18%	674 of 1,045	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	30.7	21.6	+42%	778 of 1,034	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	32.2	22.7	+42%	912 of 1,142	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2020	not published	75.0	24.5	+206%	1,121 of 1,167	DNV	C
2019	not published	72.6	25.0	+191%	1,092 of 1,154	DNV	C
2018	not published	38.6	24.9	+55%	815 of 1,044	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.