Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO SPAIN

IMO: 9516442
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 111,897 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.55 g CO₂/t·nm

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 111,897 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

312

Container median 182 kg/nm (+71%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.68

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−57%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

121.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

23,044 t

CO₂ emitted

71,845 t

Distance sailed

73,970 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,566 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2018

Set against all 1,705 container ships with a full-year 2018 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 312 kg/nm · median 182 (+71%)

82.0Ranks 1,529 of 1,705, lowest first313

Average speedThis ship 16.2 kn · median 13.8 (+17%)

8.7Faster than 82% of container ships16.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.68 g CO₂/t·nm · median 20.2 (−57%)

8.65Ranks 177 of 1,705, lowest first54.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU53%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,114 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2018	not published	23,044	71,845	73,970	4,566	16.2	312	8.68	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2018	not published	8.68	20.2	−57%	177 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.