Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO ITALY

IMO: 9516454
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 96,559 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.55 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 110,715 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

327

Container median 182 kg/nm (+80%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.20

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−55%)

Average speed

16.6 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

130.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,699 t

CO₂ emitted

61,415 t

Distance sailed

60,294 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,624 h

151 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 310 kg/nm · median 174 (+78%)

82.1Ranks 1,615 of 1,788, lowest first309

Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 13.7 (+22%)

8.6Faster than 92% of container ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (−47%)

7.86Ranks 320 of 1,788, lowest first55.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU50%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

737 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO ITALY
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

COSCO ITALY
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO ITALY
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−5%	−5%	−39%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	11,407	35,594	36,826	2,200	16.7	310	10.0	–
2018	not published	19,699	61,415	60,294	3,624	16.6	327	9.20	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	10.0	18.9	−47%	320 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	9.20	20.2	−55%	205 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.