Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

HALISDEMIR

IMO: 9517331
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Emiroglu Deniz Nakliyati ve Tic.Ltd.Sti.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

29.1 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

21.05

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−17%)

Average speed

4.2 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−55%)

Fuel per day at sea

3.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

219 t

CO₂ emitted

688 t

699 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,549 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,776 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 29.1 kg/nm · median 35.3 (−18%)

17.4Ranks 1,093 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 4.2 kn · median 9.3 (−55%)

7.0Faster than 0% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 21.05 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−17%)

10.14Ranks 912 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU62%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (356 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HALISDEMIR
General cargo median

20.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HALISDEMIR
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

HALISDEMIR
General cargo median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−5.2 kn	+13%	−48%	−37%	−22%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−20%	−26%	−36%	+19%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	+6%	+18%	+25%	+5%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−13%	−3%	−29%	−15%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+5%	−1%	+39%	+23%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	−7%	+23%	−8%	−30%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	+2%	+12%	+51%	+1,264%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Emiroglu Deniz Nakliyati ve Tic.Ltd.Sti.	219	688	7,549	1,776	4.2	29.1	–	–
2024	Emiroglu Deniz Nakliyati ve Tic.Ltd.Sti.	309	973	11,981	1,278	9.4	25.8	–	38%
2023	not published	603	1,894	18,735	1,850	10.1	32.2	–	76%
2022	not published	458	1,443	15,043	1,672	9.0	30.4	–	–
2021	not published	740	2,333	21,226	2,594	8.2	34.9	–	–
2020	not published	505	1,597	15,254	1,743	8.8	33.1	–	–
2019	not published	590	1,848	16,578	2,516	6.6	35.6	–	–
2018	not published	382	1,198	10,976	1,829	6.0	34.8	2.16	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Emiroglu Deniz Nakliyati ve Tic.Ltd.Sti.	21.05	25.45	−17%	912 of 2,706	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	Emiroglu Deniz Nakliyati ve Tic.Ltd.Sti.	27.06	19.25	+41%	839 of 1,111	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	22.67	20.67	+10%	613 of 1,045	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2022	not published	21.57	21.57	+0%	517 of 1,034	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	25.46	22.70	+12%	703 of 1,142	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	20.67	24.50	−16%	401 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	29.46	24.96	+18%	724 of 1,154	Indian Register of Shipping	B
2018	not published	2.16	24.89	−91%	1 of 1,044	Indian Register of Shipping	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.