Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

TG TAURUS

IMO: 9523835
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,901 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: RT STAR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: TAI RONG SHIPPING LIMITED

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,517 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

83.0

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+40%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,542 t

CO₂ emitted

7,981 t

Distance sailed

30,622 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,519 h

105 days, 29% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 95.9 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+19%)

53.8Ranks 941 of 1,274, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 11.0 (+5%)

8.7Faster than 64% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.7 (+12%)

8.47Ranks 733 of 1,274, lowest first42.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU34%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

1,929 t

76% of all fuel; 24% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

705 t

8.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TG TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

TG TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TG TAURUS
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+32%	+29%	+45%	+51%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−9%	−1%	+82%	−72%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+3.8 kn	+12%	+74%	+7%	–	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−5.1 kn	−15%	−50%	−76%	–	5.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	+28%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−0%	−13%	−34%	+5%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	TAI RONG SHIPPING LIMITED	1,982	6,186	20,673	1,798	11.5	95.9	18.8	–
2023	not published	1,034	3,248	14,236	1,204	11.8	72.7	12.5	–
2022	not published	622	1,978	7,813	715	10.9	79.6	44.6	46%
2021	not published	518	1,626	7,315	1,034	7.1	70.8	165	20%
2020	not published	2,542	7,981	30,622	2,519	12.2	83.0	22.6	76%
2019	not published	2,192	6,905	23,849	1,952	12.2	91.9	22.1	83%
2018	not published	3,351	10,515	36,348	2,583	14.1	92.2	21.1	89%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	TAI RONG SHIPPING LIMITED	18.8	16.7	+12%	733 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	12.5	16.2	−23%	390 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	44.6	16.1	+177%	1,309 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	22.6	16.2	+40%	914 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	22.1	17.3	+28%	873 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	21.1	17.1	+23%	842 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.