Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK LAVRAS

IMO: 9526928
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 46,466 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEDI 10.02 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 49,914 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

257

Container median 182 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−20%)

Average speed

17.9 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+30%)

Fuel per day at sea

110.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

23,756 t

CO₂ emitted

74,189 t

Distance sailed

92,435 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,159 h

215 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 220 kg/nm · median 174 (+26%)

82.1Ranks 1,091 of 1,788, lowest first309

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.7 (+1%)

8.6Faster than 51% of container ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (−22%)

7.86Ranks 635 of 1,788, lowest first55.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU34%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

23,756 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,024 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK LAVRAS
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

MAERSK LAVRAS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK LAVRAS
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	−4.1 kn	−14%	−34%	−70%	−8%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	6,017	18,743	27,329	1,975	13.8	220	14.8	100%
2018	not published	23,756	74,189	92,435	5,159	17.9	257	16.1	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	14.8	18.9	−22%	635 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	16.1	20.2	−20%	610 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.