Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MED NORDIC

IMO: 9527776
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 5,593 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: BLACK STAR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,593 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

74.5 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.16

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+180%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,017 t

CO₂ emitted

9,549 t

9,697 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

40,495 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,969 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 74.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−7%)

52.8Ranks 599 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 11.1 (−8%)

8.8Faster than 27% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.16 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+180%)

7.93Ranks 1,332 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports73%
From the EU2%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU7%

90% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,579 t).

Fuel burned laden

95% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MED NORDIC
Chemical tanker median

50.075.0100.0125.0150.0175.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED NORDIC
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED NORDIC
Chemical tanker median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+3%	+1%	−10%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+0%	+0%	+10%	−27%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+2.4 kn	+5%	+36%	+4%	+53%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.6 kn	−55%	−66%	−13%	−59%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 55%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+83%	+94%	+320%	+78%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 83%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.5 kn	+2%	+58%	−78%	−1%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+4%	−6%	+9%	+3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi	3,017	9,549	40,495	3,969	10.2	74.5	42.16	5%
2024	YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi	3,254	10,222	44,971	4,333	10.4	72.3	48.47	–
2023	not published	2,948	9,272	40,805	3,935	10.4	72.3	66.37	–
2022	not published	2,704	8,609	39,187	4,905	8.0	69.0	43.38	–
2021	not published	6,916	22,171	44,953	4,244	10.6	153.8	106.62	2%
2020	not published	902	2,891	10,710	1,074	10.0	84.2	59.79	–
2019	not published	3,974	12,526	48,132	7,449	6.5	82.6	60.48	67%
2018	not published	3,522	11,116	44,148	6,197	7.1	79.8	58.52	68%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi	42.16	15.04	+180%	1,332 of 1,460	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	YMN Tanker Deniz Isletmeciligi	48.47	16.73	+190%	1,186 of 1,274	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	66.37	16.23	+309%	1,279 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2022	not published	43.38	16.06	+170%	1,302 of 1,409	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2021	not published	106.62	16.69	+539%	1,340 of 1,343	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2020	not published	59.79	9.03	+562%	1,834 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2019	not published	60.48	8.83	+585%	1,881 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2018	not published	58.52	8.86	+560%	1,747 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.