Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

TORM GRACE

IMO: 9531648
Type: Oil tanker
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.24 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SKS DODA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Torm Singapore Pte Ltd · part of TORM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

–

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

–

Fuel per day at sea

–

Fuel consumed

0 t

CO₂ emitted

0 t

0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

–

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

0 h

0 days, 0% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 125.8 kg/nm · median 129.0 (−2%)

79.5Ranks 829 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 10.9 (+16%)

8.1Faster than 95% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (−46%)

4.44Ranks 164 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

–

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TORM GRACE
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TORM GRACE
Oil tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TORM GRACE
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	−3%	+7%	−19%	−26%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−19%	−12%	+280%	−1%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+7.0 kn	−64%	+8%	+120%	–	7.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 64%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.7 kn	+152%	+8%	−84%	–	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 152%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.2 kn	+17%	−8%	−41%	+2%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+23%	+11%	+428%	+60%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Torm Singapore Pte Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024part-year	OSM Bergen Tank AS	1,124	3,529	9,602	762	12.6	117.1	4.77	–
2024	Torm Singapore Pte Ltd	2,718	8,513	21,615	1,717	12.6	125.8	4.36	–
2023	not published	3,434	10,803	26,558	2,323	11.4	129.3	5.91	–
2022	not published	1,118	3,502	6,981	664	10.5	160.1	5.99	–
2021	not published	1,407	4,489	3,178	904	3.5	442.7	122.15	–
2020	not published	3,484	10,915	19,840	2,413	8.2	175.6	5.97	–
2019	not published	4,990	15,662	33,364	3,193	10.4	149.6	5.83	–
2018	not published	772	2,408	6,322	548	11.5	122.1	3.65	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Torm Singapore Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024part-year	OSM Bergen Tank AS	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	Torm Singapore Pte Ltd	4.36	8.06	−46%	164 of 1,787	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	5.91	8.44	−30%	408 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	5.99	8.51	−30%	453 of 1,961	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	5.97	9.03	−34%	355 of 1,870	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	5.83	8.83	−34%	393 of 1,919	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	3.65	8.86	−59%	135 of 1,779	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.