Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

FINN III

IMO: 9534456
Type: General cargo ship
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: OSLO FOREST 2

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Finn III" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

42.6 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

17.38

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−32%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,124 t

CO₂ emitted

6,680 t

6,785 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

49,812 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,384 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 42.6 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+21%)

17.4Ranks 1,653 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 9.3 (+23%)

7.0Faster than 84% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 17.38 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−32%)

10.14Ranks 590 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU45%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU4%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,555 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FINN III
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FINN III
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

FINN III
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−7%	−3%	−16%	−51%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−4%	−6%	+21%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−5%	−4%	+2%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+4%	+5%	−18%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+3%	+1%	−3%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−1%	+7%	+6%	+26%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	+4%	+16%	+71%	−17%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Finn III" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	2,124	6,680	49,812	4,384	11.4	42.6	–	–
2024part-year	Bulkship Management AS	846	2,669	18,234	1,708	10.7	46.4	–	–
2024	MS "Finn III" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	2,728	8,625	59,403	5,475	10.8	45.9	35.81	–
2023	not published	2,335	7,354	48,987	4,369	11.2	47.7	–	–
2022	not published	2,413	7,600	48,260	4,320	11.2	50.0	–	–
2021	not published	2,831	8,920	58,798	5,311	11.1	48.1	–	–
2020	not published	2,833	8,911	60,517	5,372	11.3	46.8	–	–
2019	not published	2,706	8,485	57,186	5,465	10.5	47.3	–	–
2018	not published	1,518	4,764	33,370	3,533	9.4	45.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Finn III" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	17.38	25.45	−32%	590 of 2,706	EnvService	B
2024part-year	Bulkship Management AS	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	MS "Finn III" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	35.81	51.55	−31%	75 of 189	EnvService	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2022	not published	31.60	21.57	+46%	794 of 1,034	DNV	A
2021	not published	24.57	22.70	+8%	676 of 1,142	DNV	A
2020	not published	25.97	24.50	+6%	649 of 1,167	DNV	A
2019	not published	20.64	24.96	−17%	377 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	25.01	24.89	+0%	524 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.