Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

RHOURD EL FARES

IMO
9537044
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
8,850 t
Port of registry
Oran
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.56 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,850 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
129.9 kg/nm
Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (+59%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
46.34
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+30%)
Average speed
7.4 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−41%)
Fuel per day at sea
23.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,553 t
CO₂ emitted
11,212 t
11,386 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
27,339 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,697 h
154 days, 42% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 129.9 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+59%)
49.8Ranks 329 of 355, lowest first124.4
Average speedThis ship 7.4 kn · median 12.6 (−41%)
8.8Faster than 4% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+30%)
14.36Ranks 215 of 355, lowest first120.18
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports11%
  • From the EU41%
  • Into the EU36%
  • At berth in the EU12%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,874 t).

Fuel burned laden
18%
83% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
12.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • RHOURD EL FARES
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • RHOURD EL FARES
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • RHOURD EL FARES
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−5.5 kn+5%−40%+15%+55%5.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.4 kn+14%+11%−29%−14%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.3 kn−9%−11%−12%+124%Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+0.5 kn+14%+18%+18%−50%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.5 kn−24%−21%−6%−36%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+4.2 kn+11%+67%−2%+15%4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.4 kn−1%−23%+15%+6%2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA3,55311,21227,3393,6977.4129.946.3418%
2024HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA2,9299,26423,6761,83112.9123.729.8255%
2023not published3,60111,38833,2872,50313.3108.234.5960%
2022not published4,45614,09537,6562,77013.6118.315.4660%
2021not published3,33810,55632,0222,44513.1104.230.9947%
2020not published4,68414,80133,9792,70512.6137.848.2861%
2019not published4,31913,56034,8484,1698.4124.042.1564%
2018not published3,79011,87430,3552,81910.8124.939.8061%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA46.3435.56+30%215 of 355Bureau VeritasB
2024HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA29.8235.82−17%130 of 306Bureau VeritasB
2023not published34.5941.77−17%141 of 330Bureau VeritasB
2022not published15.4642.53−64%32 of 348Bureau VeritasB
2021not published30.9946.91−34%94 of 323Bureau VeritasB
2020not published48.2842.29+14%189 of 339Bureau VeritasB
2019not published42.1545.85−8%159 of 331Bureau VeritasB
2018not published39.8053.11−25%122 of 297Bureau VeritasB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

RHOURD EL FARES (IMO 9537044): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze