Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

RHOURD EL FARES

IMO
9537044
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
8,850 t
Flag (estimated)
Algeria
Port of registry
Oran
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.56 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,890 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
108
Gas carrier (LPG) median 83.3 kg/nm (+30%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
34.6
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 41.8 (−17%)
Average speed
13.3 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.8 kn (+4%)
Fuel per day at sea
34.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,601 t
CO₂ emitted
11,388 t
Distance sailed
33,287 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,503 h
104 days, 29% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 130 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+59%)
49.8Ranks 329 of 355, lowest first124
Average speedThis ship 7.4 kn · median 12.6 (−41%)
8.8Faster than 4% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+30%)
14.4Ranks 215 of 355, lowest first120
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports7%
  • From the EU40%
  • Into the EU37%
  • At berth in the EU16%
Fuel burned laden
2,157 t
60% of all fuel; 40% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,848 t
16.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • RHOURD EL FARES
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • RHOURD EL FARES
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • RHOURD EL FARES
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−5.5 kn+5%−40%+15%+55%5.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.4 kn+14%+11%−29%−14%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.3 kn−9%−11%−12%+124%Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+0.5 kn+14%+18%+18%−50%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.5 kn−24%−21%−6%−36%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+4.2 kn+11%+67%−2%+15%4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.4 kn−1%−23%+15%+6%2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA3,55311,21227,3393,6977.413046.318%
2024HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA2,9299,26423,6761,83112.912429.855%
2023not published3,60111,38833,2872,50313.310834.660%
2022not published4,45614,09537,6562,77013.611815.560%
2021not published3,33810,55632,0222,44513.110431.047%
2020not published4,68414,80133,9792,70512.613848.361%
2019not published4,31913,56034,8484,1698.412442.264%
2018not published3,79011,87430,3552,81910.812539.861%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA46.335.6+30%215 of 355Bureau VeritasB
2024HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA29.835.8−17%130 of 306Bureau VeritasB
2023not published34.641.8−17%141 of 330Bureau VeritasB
2022not published15.542.5−64%32 of 348Bureau VeritasB
2021not published31.046.9−34%94 of 323Bureau VeritasB
2020not published48.342.3+14%189 of 339Bureau VeritasB
2019not published42.245.9−8%159 of 331Bureau VeritasB
2018not published39.853.1−25%122 of 297Bureau VeritasB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.