Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

EPSILON

IMO: 9539054
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.66 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Morani Shipping Company Limited

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

174

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

32.1

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−95%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

300

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+19%)

Average speed

17.4 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,211 t

CO₂ emitted

50,835 t

Distance sailed

93,338 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,351 h

223 days, 61% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 140 kg/nm · median 150 (−7%)

69.3Ranks 166 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 15.8 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 36% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 52.6 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−91%)

66.8Ranks 26 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 208 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−18%)

48.6Ranks 179 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports44%
From the EU26%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,211 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EPSILON
Ro-pax median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EPSILON
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

EPSILON
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

EPSILON
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	+0%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−2.8 kn	−23%	−35%	−44%	+141%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	+2%	+5%	+1%	−10%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+1.7 kn	+5%	+17%	+4%	−99%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.3 kn	−1%	−18%	−12%	+1,260,280%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−5%	−5%	+14%	−91%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	+0%	−46%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Morani Shipping Company Limited	7,367	23,306	52,821	3,557	14.9	140	–	–
2024	Morani Shipping Company Limited	7,203	22,768	52,691	3,496	15.1	137	–	–
2023	not published	16,652	52,298	94,110	5,248	17.9	177	–	–
2022	not published	16,211	50,835	93,338	5,351	17.4	174	–	–
2021	not published	14,762	46,295	89,377	5,675	15.7	165	–	–
2020	not published	16,841	52,889	101,245	5,319	19.0	166	–	–
2019	not published	15,554	48,784	88,515	4,656	19.0	176	–	–
2018	not published	14,995	47,010	88,270	4,667	18.9	170	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Morani Shipping Company Limited	52.6	567	−91%	26 of 408	208	253	−18%	DNV	B
2024	Morani Shipping Company Limited	69.6	547	−87%	50 of 404	274	233	+18%	DNV	B
2023	not published	28.9	680	−96%	17 of 386	291	234	+24%	DNV	B
2022	not published	32.1	626	−95%	21 of 394	300	253	+19%	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	3,781	815	+364%	363 of 377	156	226	−31%	DNV	B
2020	not published	0.30	751	−100%	5 of 387	0.35	217	−100%	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	3.46	569	−99%	26 of 394	0.37	223	−100%	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	6.39	729	−99%	33 of 361	0.32	184	−100%	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.