Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ALEXANDER

IMO
9541150
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Russia
Port of registry
Novorossiysk
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.71 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
46.4
General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (−20%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
42.3
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (+70%)
Average speed
4.7 kn
General cargo median 9.7 kn (−52%)
Fuel per day at sea
5.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
76 t
CO₂ emitted
239 t
Distance sailed
1,641 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
348 h
15 days, 4% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 51.4 kg/nm · median 55.1 (−7%)
36.0Ranks 519 of 1,167, lowest first90.9
Average speedThis ship 6.9 kn · median 10.7 (−36%)
8.2Faster than 3% of general cargo ships12.9
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 44.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.5 (+81%)
11.3Ranks 1,016 of 1,167, lowest first48.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU26%
  • Into the EU59%
  • At berth in the EU15%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
36 t
14.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ALEXANDER
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • ALEXANDER
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • ALEXANDER
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+2.2 kn+11%+63%+414%+5%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published4341,3598,4401,2316.951.4––
2019not published762391,6413484.746.4––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2020not published44.324.5+81%1,016 of 1,167VerifaviaA
2019not published42.325.0+70%951 of 1,154VerifaviaA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.