Navalyze · Con-ro · Ship

AL JUBAIL

IMO: 9547219
Type: Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Former names: JOLLY TITANIO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GFS Ship Management FZE

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

129.9 kg/nm

Con-ro median 135.4 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

20.62

g CO₂/m³·nm · Con-ro median 9.92 (+108%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Con-ro median 13.9 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

40.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,271 t

CO₂ emitted

3,994 t

4,057 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,787 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

749 h

31 days, 9% of the year

Within the con-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 58 con-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 129.9 kg/nm · median 135.4 (−4%)

95.0Ranks 20 of 58, lowest first162.0

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 13.9 (−6%)

12.9Faster than 17% of con-ro ships15.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 20.62 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.92 (+108%)

4.60Ranks 50 of 58, lowest first40.84

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Con-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU55%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU6%

30% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,208 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Con-ro median is the middle ship of all con-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AL JUBAIL
Con-ro median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL JUBAIL
Con-ro median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL JUBAIL
Con-ro median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−11%	−3%	−48%	+43%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−11%	−19%	−22%	+72%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+5%	−0%	+37%	+35%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−0%	+1%	−4%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−11%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	−50%	−19%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−11%	−12%	−32%	−45%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	GFS Ship Management FZE	724	2,270	5,650	428	13.2	128.1	–	–
2025	Noatum CSM FZCO	1,271	3,994	9,787	749	13.1	129.9	–	–
2024part-year	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	377	1,175	2,570	199	12.9	146.8	–	–
2024	GFS Ship Management FZE	2,744	8,569	18,803	1,564	12.0	146.0	–	–
2023	not published	3,956	12,322	24,120	1,823	13.2	164.0	–	–
2022	not published	2,761	8,607	17,641	1,269	13.9	156.5	–	–
2021	not published	2,897	9,029	18,455	1,345	13.7	157.0	–	–
2020	not published	3,122	9,723	20,701	1,500	13.8	150.8	–	–
2019	not published	6,107	19,032	41,169	3,051	13.5	148.3	–	9%
2018	not published	10,142	31,594	60,792	4,477	13.6	166.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	Con-ro median	vs Con-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	GFS Ship Management FZE	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C
2025	Noatum CSM FZCO	20.62	9.92	+108%	50 of 58	DNV	A+B+C
2024part-year	Ignazio Messina & C. S.p.A.	–	–	–	–	RINA	A+B
2024	GFS Ship Management FZE	14.39	9.36	+54%	52 of 64	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	8.38	8.42	−0%	28 of 56	RINA	B
2022	not published	6.20	7.68	−19%	13 of 59	RINA	B
2021	not published	7.42	8.10	−8%	24 of 62	RINA	B
2020	not published	7.89	8.53	−8%	24 of 69	RINA	B
2019	not published	9.74	9.58	+2%	36 of 67	RINA	B
2018	not published	17.64	11.58	+52%	53 of 65	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Con-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's con-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.