Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

PEACE

IMO: 9553983
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 9,965 t
Flag (estimated): Bulgaria
Port of registry: Burgas
Technical efficiency: EIV 9.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ribex Maritime Ltd

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,528 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

46.0

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

17.3

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (−29%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,081 t

CO₂ emitted

6,670 t

Distance sailed

45,266 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,329 h

180 days, 49% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 50.4 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+43%)

17.4Ranks 1,892 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 9.3 (−8%)

6.9Faster than 32% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 16.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−37%)

10.2Ranks 515 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU44%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

1,159 t

56% of all fuel; 44% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

116 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PEACE
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PEACE
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

PEACE
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−6%	−20%	+51%	+1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−13%	−7%	−11%	−25%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+23%	+19%	+37%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+6%	+2%	−44%	+2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+3%	−1%	−4%	+1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.8 kn	−21%	+44%	+32%	−55%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−7%	+0%	+9%	+184%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Ribex Maritime Ltd	2,248	7,136	44,590	5,213	8.6	50.4	16.1	–
2024	Ribex Maritime Ltd	1,590	5,012	29,552	2,950	10.0	53.8	16.0	97%
2023	not published	2,043	6,456	33,162	3,561	9.3	61.6	21.2	71%
2022	not published	1,212	3,886	24,210	2,512	9.6	50.1	17.8	74%
2021	not published	2,047	6,557	43,279	4,300	10.1	47.3	17.5	55%
2020	not published	2,081	6,670	45,266	4,329	10.5	46.0	17.3	56%
2019	not published	2,004	6,259	34,297	6,019	5.7	58.4	38.3	50%
2018	not published	1,966	6,141	31,380	5,931	5.3	62.6	1,048	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Ribex Maritime Ltd	16.1	25.5	−37%	515 of 2,723	RINA	B
2024	Ribex Maritime Ltd	16.0	19.3	−17%	441 of 1,111	RINA	B
2023	not published	21.2	20.7	+3%	553 of 1,045	RINA	B
2022	not published	17.8	21.6	−18%	349 of 1,034	RINA	B
2021	not published	17.5	22.7	−23%	317 of 1,142	RINA	B
2020	not published	17.3	24.5	−29%	252 of 1,167	RINA	B
2019	not published	38.3	25.0	+54%	911 of 1,154	RINA	B
2018	not published	13.5	24.9	−46%	163 of 1,044	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.