Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MUZAFFER ANA

IMO: 9554157
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.78 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

39.0 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

17.56

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−31%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+24%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,008 t

CO₂ emitted

3,189 t

3,239 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,809 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,250 h

94 days, 26% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 39.0 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+10%)

17.4Ranks 1,502 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 9.3 (+24%)

7.0Faster than 85% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 17.56 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−31%)

10.14Ranks 609 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU25%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU9%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,260 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MUZAFFER ANA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MUZAFFER ANA
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MUZAFFER ANA
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.6 kn	−11%	+15%	+75%	−13%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+7%	−6%	+3%	+19%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+2%	−6%	−34%	+37%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−7%	−9%	−17%	−16%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+13%	+18%	−28%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	−15%	+34%	+12%	−18%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.9 kn	+6%	−26%	−1%	–	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.	1,008	3,189	25,809	2,250	11.5	39.0	–	–
2024	POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.	646	2,041	14,732	1,647	8.9	43.8	–	–
2023	not published	589	1,873	14,313	1,410	10.2	41.1	–	–
2022	not published	873	2,781	21,752	1,972	11.0	40.1	–	–
2021	not published	1,125	3,555	26,210	2,307	11.4	42.9	–	–
2020	not published	1,369	4,377	36,194	3,330	10.9	37.8	–	–
2019	not published	1,437	4,502	32,304	4,644	7.0	44.5	–	–
2018	not published	1,374	4,303	32,686	3,306	9.9	42.0	15.18	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.	17.56	25.45	−31%	609 of 2,706	Verifavia	A
2024	POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.	20.21	19.25	+5%	593 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	17.02	20.67	−18%	384 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	12.44	21.57	−42%	195 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	14.81	22.70	−35%	212 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	14.44	24.50	−41%	175 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	17.65	24.96	−29%	252 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.