Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MUZAFFER ANA

IMO: 9554157
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.78 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

44.5

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

17.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (−29%)

Average speed

7.0 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (−28%)

Fuel per day at sea

7.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,437 t

CO₂ emitted

4,502 t

Distance sailed

32,304 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,644 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 39.0 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+11%)

17.4Ranks 1,519 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 9.3 (+24%)

6.9Faster than 85% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 17.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−31%)

10.2Ranks 607 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports42%
From the EU16%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

133 t

3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MUZAFFER ANA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MUZAFFER ANA
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MUZAFFER ANA
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.6 kn	−11%	+15%	+75%	−13%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+7%	−6%	+3%	+19%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+2%	−6%	−34%	+37%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−7%	−9%	−17%	−16%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+13%	+18%	−28%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	−15%	+34%	+12%	−18%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.9 kn	+6%	−26%	−1%	–	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.	1,008	3,189	25,809	2,250	11.5	39.0	–	–
2024	POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.	646	2,041	14,732	1,647	8.9	43.8	–	–
2023	not published	589	1,873	14,313	1,410	10.2	41.1	–	–
2022	not published	873	2,781	21,752	1,972	11.0	40.1	–	–
2021	not published	1,125	3,555	26,210	2,307	11.4	42.9	–	–
2020	not published	1,369	4,377	36,194	3,330	10.9	37.8	–	–
2019	not published	1,437	4,502	32,304	4,644	7.0	44.5	–	–
2018	not published	1,374	4,303	32,686	3,306	9.9	42.0	15.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.	17.6	25.5	−31%	607 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	POCHARD SHIPPING & TRADING LTD.	20.2	19.3	+5%	593 of 1,111	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	17.0	20.7	−18%	384 of 1,045	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	12.4	21.6	−42%	195 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	14.8	22.7	−35%	212 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	14.4	24.5	−41%	175 of 1,167	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	17.7	25.0	−29%	252 of 1,154	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.