Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MATTEO BR

IMO: 9556844
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 16,142 t
Port of registry: Napoli
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.65 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Blu Marine Srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,142 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

73.2 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+107%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

13.27

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−48%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,336 t

CO₂ emitted

7,388 t

7,503 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,917 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,176 h

132 days, 36% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.2 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+107%)

17.4Ranks 2,322 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 9.3 (+9%)

7.0Faster than 65% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 13.27 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−48%)

10.14Ranks 400 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU30%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU4%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,726 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MATTEO BR
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MATTEO BR
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MATTEO BR
General cargo median

0.050.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−6%	−11%	+21%	−13%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+10%	+9%	−13%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	+18%	−91%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+12%	+7%	−18%	+939%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	+1%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+6.2 kn	−18%	+83%	+29%	−16%	6.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.9 kn	+16%	−47%	−44%	+19%	5.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Blu Marine Srl	2,336	7,388	31,917	3,176	10.1	73.2	14.34	–
2024	Blu Marine Srl	2,043	6,419	26,325	2,468	10.7	77.6	16.70	–
2023	not published	2,142	6,781	30,227	2,825	10.7	70.8	15.42	–
2022	not published	1,988	6,297	25,533	2,372	10.8	77.8	21.21	–
2021	not published	2,158	6,835	31,207	2,769	11.3	69.2	14.57	–
2020	not published	2,111	6,621	30,836	2,762	11.2	68.5	13.54	38%
2019	not published	1,996	6,262	23,817	4,802	5.0	83.8	16.11	93%
2018	not published	3,053	9,577	42,410	3,898	10.9	72.0	13.49	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Blu Marine Srl	13.27	25.45	−48%	400 of 2,706	RINA	A+B
2024	Blu Marine Srl	15.34	19.25	−20%	416 of 1,111	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	13.63	20.67	−34%	282 of 1,045	RINA	A+B
2022	not published	151.38	21.57	+602%	1,017 of 1,034	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	14.57	8.57	+70%	3,057 of 3,466	RINA	A+B
2020	not published	13.54	8.24	+64%	2,750 of 3,150	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	16.11	8.38	+92%	3,071 of 3,360	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	13.49	8.50	+59%	2,870 of 3,384	RINA	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.