Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

TURAN C

IMO: 9558490
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.93 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: PHOENIX

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EC DENIZCILIK VE NAKLIYAT TIC.LTD STI

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,920 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

53.2

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

26.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+6%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,018 t

CO₂ emitted

3,265 t

Distance sailed

19,136 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,023 h

84 days, 23% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 41.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+19%)

17.4Ranks 1,637 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 9.3 (−11%)

6.9Faster than 26% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 12.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−52%)

10.2Ranks 359 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU31%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

612 t

60% of all fuel; 40% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

76 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TURAN C
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TURAN C
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TURAN C
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.5 kn	−53%	−33%	+479%	−82%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 53%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2024	−3.9 kn	+69%	+2%	−93%	+294%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 69%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+15%	+12%	−3%	−7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−14%	−10%	+81%	−28%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.4 kn	−13%	+61%	+41%	−7%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−2%	−19%	−54%	+73%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	EC DENIZCILIK VE NAKLIYAT TIC.LTD STI	569	1,798	13,608	1,639	8.3	41.8	–	–
2024	EC DENIZCILIK VE NAKLIYAT TIC.LTD STI	208	656	2,351	402	5.8	88.3	–	81%
2022	not published	1,761	5,612	33,585	3,453	9.7	52.4	33.9	81%
2021	not published	1,576	5,051	34,561	3,465	10.0	45.6	18.7	55%
2020	not published	1,018	3,265	19,136	2,023	9.5	53.2	21.5	60%
2019	not published	826	2,592	13,528	2,637	5.1	61.0	28.1	60%
2018	not published	1,824	5,739	29,416	4,688	6.3	62.0	16.3	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	EC DENIZCILIK VE NAKLIYAT TIC.LTD STI	12.2	25.5	−52%	359 of 2,723	Polish Register of Shipping	A
2024	EC DENIZCILIK VE NAKLIYAT TIC.LTD STI	68.3	19.3	+255%	1,078 of 1,111	RINA	A
2022	not published	17.4	21.6	−20%	337 of 1,034	RINA	A
2021	not published	18.7	22.7	−18%	378 of 1,142	RINA	B
2020	not published	26.1	24.5	+6%	652 of 1,167	RINA	B
2019	not published	28.1	25.0	+13%	688 of 1,154	RINA	B
2018	not published	16.3	24.9	−35%	213 of 1,044	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.