Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

C TIGER

IMO: 9583706
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 22,015 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.18 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHARMEY, MORGES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: OCEANA SHIPPING AG

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,015 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

76.0 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.77

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+33%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

931 t

CO₂ emitted

2,905 t

2,951 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

12,252 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,098 h

46 days, 13% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 76.0 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−10%)

61.8Ranks 1,013 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.6 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 71% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.77 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+33%)

4.85Ranks 2,289 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU69%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU4%

21% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (615 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

C TIGER
Bulk carrier median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

C TIGER
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

C TIGER
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−5%	−8%	−53%	+13%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−3%	−6%	−4%	+12%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−0%	+6%	+36%	−15%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	−39%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+352%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+2%	−7%	−8%	−15%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024part-year	OCEANA SHIPPING AG	444	1,385	6,249	567	11.0	71.1	12.54	–
2024	Reefer & General Ship-Mgmt Co	931	2,905	12,252	1,098	11.2	76.0	10.77	–
2023	not published	2,075	6,491	25,892	2,258	11.5	80.2	9.56	–
2022	not published	2,232	6,993	27,047	2,274	11.9	82.5	8.57	–
2021	not published	1,641	5,144	19,819	1,767	11.2	82.8	10.03	–
2020	not published	2,628	8,236	32,501	2,868	11.3	80.9	9.58	–
2019	not published	603	1,878	7,190	641	11.2	83.9	7.92	–
2018	not published	646	2,015	7,831	639	12.3	82.5	9.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	OCEANA SHIPPING AG	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Reefer & General Ship-Mgmt Co	10.77	8.09	+33%	2,289 of 3,089	RINA	A
2023	not published	9.56	8.27	+16%	2,225 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	8.57	8.71	−2%	1,924 of 3,968	RINA	A
2021	not published	10.03	8.57	+17%	2,270 of 3,466	RINA	A
2020	not published	9.58	8.24	+16%	2,051 of 3,150	RINA	A
2019	not published	7.92	8.38	−5%	1,499 of 3,360	RINA	A
2018	not published	9.34	8.50	+10%	2,000 of 3,384	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.