Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STAVANGERFJORD

IMO: 9586605
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Hirtshals
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.19 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fjord Line Danmark A/S

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

119

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

224

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−69%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

382

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+108%)

Average speed

18.1 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

51.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,638 t

CO₂ emitted

43,392 t

Distance sailed

131,995 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,302 h

304 days, 83% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 113 kg/nm · median 150 (−25%)

69.3Ranks 109 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 17.8 kn · median 15.8 (+13%)

12.0Faster than 69% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 561 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−1%)

66.8Ranks 202 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 71.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−72%)

48.6Ranks 60 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

881 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STAVANGERFJORD
Ro-pax median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STAVANGERFJORD
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.019.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

STAVANGERFJORD
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300400500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

STAVANGERFJORD
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	+5%	+52%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2024	+0.6 kn	+8%	+12%	+27%	+82%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	−17%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+21%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−5%	−10%	−26%	−10%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−1%	−1%	+1%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Fjord Line Danmark A/S	14,913	40,646	131,808	7,396	17.8	113	–	–
2024LNG	Fjord Line Danmark A/S	14,063	38,531	125,946	7,132	17.7	112	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,224	28,749	99,234	5,789	17.1	103	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	12,851	35,728	119,575	6,974	17.1	108	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10,979	30,647	98,551	5,803	17.0	111	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	15,718	43,650	133,449	7,446	17.9	118	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	15,638	43,392	131,995	7,302	18.1	119	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Fjord Line Danmark A/S	561	567	−1%	202 of 408	71.0	253	−72%	DNV	A+B+C
2024LNG	Fjord Line Danmark A/S	369	547	−32%	157 of 404	195	233	−16%	DNV	A+B
2022LNG / alt.	not published	203	626	−68%	102 of 394	269	253	+6%	Verifavia	A
2021LNG / alt.	not published	237	815	−71%	104 of 377	347	226	+54%	Verifavia	A
2020LNG / alt.	not published	211	751	−72%	100 of 387	330	217	+52%	Verifavia	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	234	569	−59%	117 of 394	401	223	+80%	Verifavia	A
2018LNG / alt.	not published	224	729	−69%	101 of 361	382	184	+108%	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.