Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HTM GRENADIER

IMO: 9587829
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 20,321 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.67 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ADARA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SOCATRA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,321 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

116.9 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.12

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+20%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,309 t

CO₂ emitted

13,568 t

13,780 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,848 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,537 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 116.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+47%)

52.8Ranks 1,369 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 11.1 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 31% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.12 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+20%)

7.93Ranks 879 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU35%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU15%

28% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,864 t).

Fuel burned laden

34%

66% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

14.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HTM GRENADIER
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HTM GRENADIER
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HTM GRENADIER
Chemical tanker median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+5%	+16%	−12%	−10%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+7%	+13%	+7%	−3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−6%	+3%	+17%	+5%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+9%	+1%	+23%	+34%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−1%	−9%	−7%	+15%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	−5%	+33%	−35%	−23%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+29%	+16%	+120%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SOCATRA	2,132	6,726	15,005	1,608	9.3	142.1	26.77	69%
2025	RED KNOT SHIPPING LTD	4,309	13,568	36,848	3,537	10.4	116.9	18.12	34%
2024	SOCATRA	4,643	14,693	41,791	4,420	9.5	111.1	20.04	65%
2023	not published	4,036	12,768	39,039	4,341	9.0	103.4	20.61	59%
2022	not published	3,676	11,654	33,316	4,064	8.2	110.3	19.68	67%
2021	not published	2,737	8,650	27,044	3,068	8.8	101.2	14.66	77%
2020	not published	2,959	9,383	29,050	3,038	9.6	101.9	12.71	75%
2019	not published	4,769	14,939	44,623	6,507	6.9	106.9	16.53	72%
2018	not published	1,680	5,264	20,242	2,650	7.6	83.0	1.24	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SOCATRA	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2025	RED KNOT SHIPPING LTD	18.12	15.04	+20%	879 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	SOCATRA	20.04	16.73	+20%	772 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2023	not published	20.61	16.23	+27%	816 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2022	not published	19.68	16.06	+23%	874 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	14.66	16.69	−12%	535 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	12.71	16.16	−21%	391 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	16.53	17.32	−5%	610 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.