Navalyze · Container · Ship

HANOI BRIDGE

IMO: 9588093
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 63,688 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ONE HANOI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 63,688 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

210.6 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−37%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

76.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,696 t

CO₂ emitted

33,384 t

33,909 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

50,793 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,372 h

141 days, 38% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 210.6 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+19%)

78.8Ranks 1,342 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 13.3 (+14%)

9.1Faster than 78% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−37%)

7.22Ranks 605 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU52%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU1%

27% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,062 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HANOI BRIDGE
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HANOI BRIDGE
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HANOI BRIDGE
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+4%	+9%	−29%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	−5%	−15%	+101%	–	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−9%	−10%	−33%	+3%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+1%	−2%	+50%	+4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+0.9 kn	−11%	−6%	+163%	−7%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	−0%	−10%	−33%	−20%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	10,696	33,384	50,793	3,372	15.1	210.6	10.32	–
2024	"K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD	14,430	45,043	71,077	4,972	14.3	203.0	–	–
2023	not published	7,537	23,537	35,342	2,207	16.0	213.2	10.73	–
2022	not published	12,311	38,456	52,759	3,241	16.3	233.3	10.40	–
2021	not published	8,124	25,374	35,159	2,085	16.9	231.1	9.97	–
2019	not published	3,480	10,858	13,375	837	16.0	260.2	10.69	–
2018	not published	5,171	16,136	19,833	1,124	17.7	260.7	13.38	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	10.32	16.30	−37%	605 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	"K" LINE SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	10.73	19.40	−45%	439 of 1,899	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	10.40	19.13	−46%	350 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	9.97	17.90	−44%	319 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	10.69	18.88	−43%	374 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	13.38	20.22	−34%	454 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.