Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GLOVIS CHALLENGE

IMO: 9590591
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,983 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: G-Marine Service Co Ltd

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

118

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

16.4 kn

Fuel per day at sea

46.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,591 t

CO₂ emitted

13,398 t

Distance sailed

38,781 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,364 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 116 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+16%)

79.6Ranks 440 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 14.4 (−2%)

12.0Faster than 44% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−6%)

34.7Ranks 221 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU42%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

331 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GLOVIS CHALLENGE
Vehicle carrier median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOVIS CHALLENGE
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLOVIS CHALLENGE
Vehicle carrier median

40.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	+9%	+31%	+181%	+10%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−4.6 kn	−11%	−36%	−82%	–	4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−4%	−1%	+28%	–	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+9%	+7%	−20%	+14%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	−1%	+14%	+42%	+33%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	+1%	−8%	+228%	−19%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	+4%	+9%	−84%	+27%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	2,305	7,207	19,921	1,408	14.1	116	51.8	–
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	751	2,345	7,087	602	11.8	106	47.1	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	4,591	13,398	38,781	2,364	16.4	118	–	–
2022	not published	3,752	11,747	30,342	1,914	15.8	124	77.2	–
2021	not published	4,287	13,399	37,753	2,332	16.2	114	67.7	–
2020	not published	3,048	9,585	26,499	1,888	14.0	115	50.8	–
2019	not published	918	2,874	8,076	524	15.4	114	62.8	–
2018	not published	5,582	17,413	50,913	3,451	14.8	110	49.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	51.8	55.4	−6%	221 of 506	Korean Register	C
2024	HYUNDAI GLOVIS CO LTD	47.1	55.3	−15%	113 of 335	Korean Register	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	77.2	57.7	+34%	339 of 463	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	67.7	59.6	+14%	283 of 459	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	50.8	57.3	−11%	158 of 449	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	62.8	59.0	+6%	243 of 426	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	49.2	62.4	−21%	71 of 434	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.