Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NSM ARKADIA

IMO: 9590797
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 27,671 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.16 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ARKADIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,289 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

105

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+44%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,109 t

CO₂ emitted

15,999 t

Distance sailed

48,573 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,566 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.8 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+18%)

61.8Ranks 2,375 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 10.6 (−9%)

8.8Faster than 20% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+40%)

4.85Ranks 2,406 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU31%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,509 t

9.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NSM ARKADIA
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

NSM ARKADIA
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NSM ARKADIA
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−6%	+4%	−39%	+19%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+7%	+0%	−46%	−17%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−4%	−8%	+6%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+12%	+13%	−15%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−14%	−21%	+2%	+0%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	+3%	+10%	+2%	−26%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024part-year	ESL Shipping Oy	1,469	4,629	14,727	1,534	9.6	99.8	11.4	–
2024	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	1,469	4,629	14,727	1,534	9.6	99.8	11.4	–
2023	not published	2,540	8,003	24,034	2,762	8.7	106	9.53	–
2022	not published	4,398	13,782	44,666	4,806	9.3	98.5	11.5	–
2021	not published	4,312	13,513	42,227	4,327	9.8	102	11.7	–
2020	not published	4,517	14,234	49,766	5,122	9.7	90.8	12.1	–
2019	not published	5,109	15,999	48,573	4,566	10.6	105	12.1	–
2018	not published	4,860	15,222	47,390	4,782	9.9	103	16.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2024part-year	ESL Shipping Oy	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	11.4	8.09	+40%	2,406 of 3,089	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	9.53	8.27	+15%	2,218 of 3,548	DNV	C
2022	not published	11.5	8.71	+32%	2,893 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	11.7	8.57	+36%	2,697 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.1	8.24	+47%	2,580 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	12.1	8.38	+44%	2,695 of 3,360	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	16.4	8.50	+93%	3,066 of 3,384	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.