Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NSM KUMPULA

IMO: 9590802
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 33,558 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.16 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: KUMPULA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,760 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

92.8

Bulk carrier median 92.4 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.50 (+58%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.4 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,860 t

CO₂ emitted

15,304 t

Distance sailed

52,367 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,022 h

209 days, 57% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 124 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+46%)

61.8Ranks 2,814 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.6 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 57% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+44%)

4.85Ranks 2,465 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports82%
From the EU3%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,278 t

8.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NSM KUMPULA
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

NSM KUMPULA
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NSM KUMPULA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+31%	+36%	−79%	−2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−10%	+13%	+47%	+77%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−3%	−24%	+21%	−66%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	+2%	+24%	−26%	+49%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+8%	+2%	−8%	+30%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	+5%	−7%	−20%	−24%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024part-year	ESL Shipping Oy	1,294	4,105	10,474	970	10.8	124	11.7	–
2024	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	1,294	4,105	10,474	970	10.8	124	11.7	–
2023	not published	4,813	15,172	50,839	4,887	10.4	94.7	11.9	–
2022	not published	3,657	11,493	34,648	4,227	8.2	106	6.71	–
2021	not published	3,098	9,721	28,583	2,720	10.5	108	19.7	–
2020	not published	4,081	12,867	38,589	4,444	8.7	106	13.2	–
2019	not published	4,090	12,824	41,909	4,543	9.2	97.6	10.2	–
2018	not published	4,860	15,304	52,367	5,022	10.4	92.8	13.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2024part-year	ESL Shipping Oy	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	HGF DENIZCILIK LTD STI	11.7	8.09	+44%	2,465 of 3,089	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	11.9	8.27	+44%	2,750 of 3,548	DNV	C
2022	not published	6.71	8.71	−23%	1,032 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	19.7	8.57	+129%	3,296 of 3,466	DNV	C
2020	not published	13.2	8.24	+61%	2,718 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	10.2	8.38	+22%	2,298 of 3,360	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	13.4	8.50	+58%	2,859 of 3,384	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.