Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

TRANS TIND

IMO: 9594054
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,734 t
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ORIENTAL LOTUS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stodig Ship Management AS

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,751 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

63.6

Chemical tanker median 84.6 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.1 (+43%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,590 t

CO₂ emitted

8,159 t

Distance sailed

40,712 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,804 h

159 days, 43% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−23%)

52.8Ranks 280 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 11.1 (+15%)

8.8Faster than 95% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+66%)

7.93Ranks 1,083 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports47%
From the EU13%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU17%

Fuel burned laden

1,893 t

73% of all fuel; 27% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,332 t

16.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TRANS TIND
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRANS TIND
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TRANS TIND
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	+7%	+20%	+7%	+17%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	−8%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−6%	−1%	+6%	+1%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	+9%	−3%	+20%	+12%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	+3%	+16%	+17%	−3%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	−19%	+9%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−56%	−54%	+26%	−61%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 56%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stodig Ship Management AS	2,619	8,242	42,679	3,345	12.8	61.4	25.0	–
2024	Stodig Ship Management AS	2,297	7,236	39,946	3,508	11.4	57.5	21.3	–
2023	not published	2,587	8,143	43,323	3,838	11.3	59.7	23.1	–
2022	not published	2,590	8,159	40,712	3,804	10.7	63.6	22.9	73%
2021	not published	1,969	6,186	33,912	2,815	12.0	58.1	20.5	82%
2020	not published	1,633	5,126	29,014	2,703	10.7	56.3	21.0	84%
2019	not published	1,968	6,180	35,738	3,256	11.0	55.1	19.2	86%
2018	not published	3,523	11,043	28,384	2,700	10.5	124	49.3	41%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stodig Ship Management AS	25.0	15.0	+66%	1,083 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	Stodig Ship Management AS	21.3	16.7	+27%	812 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	23.1	16.2	+42%	887 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	22.9	16.1	+43%	996 of 1,409	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	20.5	16.7	+23%	866 of 1,343	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	21.0	16.2	+30%	879 of 1,312	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	19.2	17.3	+11%	768 of 1,321	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	49.3	17.1	+188%	1,190 of 1,294	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.