Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GASLOG SANTIAGO

IMO: 9600530
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.81 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

247

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

7.35

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−32%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,478 t

CO₂ emitted

15,224 t

Distance sailed

22,173 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,791 h

75 days, 20% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 413 kg/nm · median 231 (+79%)

167Ranks 344 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 8.4 kn · median 14.2 (−41%)

10.7Faster than 4% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 53.7 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+490%)

5.47Ranks 346 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU29%
Into the EU66%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

3,665 t

67% of all fuel; 33% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

639 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GASLOG SANTIAGO
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

GASLOG SANTIAGO
LNG carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GASLOG SANTIAGO
LNG carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−3.1 kn	−11%	−35%	−4%	+128%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−3.8 kn	+90%	+42%	+4%	+417%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 90%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.7 kn	+10%	−1%	−82%	−38%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.6 kn	−11%	+23%	+165%	+1%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	4,352	13,075	10,538	1,256	8.4	413	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5,090	14,948	11,011	956	11.5	462	–	32%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	2,591	7,141	10,621	694	15.3	244	–	98%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12,999	35,866	58,861	3,460	17.0	221	–	54%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5,478	15,224	22,173	1,791	12.4	247	–	67%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	53.7	9.10	+490%	346 of 355	ABS	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	23.6	10.4	+127%	335 of 379	ABS	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	4.56	10.5	−56%	12 of 289	ABS	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7.41	10.7	−31%	43 of 267	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	7.35	10.9	−32%	39 of 248	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.