Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC AJACCIO

IMO: 9605267
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 49,659 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.82 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 49,659 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

268.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.88

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+4%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,177 t

CO₂ emitted

25,498 t

25,899 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

30,418 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,043 h

85 days, 23% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 268.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+52%)

78.8Ranks 1,795 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 75% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.88 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+4%)

7.22Ranks 1,148 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports75%
From the EU1%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU6%

37% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,418 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC AJACCIO
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC AJACCIO
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC AJACCIO
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−25%	−27%	+110%	+43%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.6 kn	+18%	+42%	−70%	−9%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.2 kn	−12%	−30%	−16%	−13%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−3%	−10%	−1%	+5%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+9%	+5%	+15%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.9 kn	+12%	+84%	+83%	−5%	6.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.2 kn	−9%	−38%	−58%	+5%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A	8,177	25,498	30,418	2,043	14.9	268.8	16.88	–
2024	COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A	5,206	16,246	14,490	947	15.3	359.3	11.83	–
2023	not published	14,661	45,689	48,077	3,779	12.7	304.9	12.99	–
2022	not published	19,970	62,275	57,562	3,622	15.9	346.9	14.98	–
2021	not published	20,850	64,965	58,110	3,409	17.0	358.8	14.21	–
2020	not published	16,663	51,976	50,553	2,858	17.7	329.6	14.34	–
2019	not published	8,087	25,224	27,600	2,550	10.8	293.0	15.12	–
2018	not published	20,932	65,252	64,964	4,062	16.0	322.2	14.44	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A	16.88	16.30	+4%	1,148 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A	11.83	17.52	−32%	590 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	12.99	19.40	−33%	600 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	14.98	19.13	−22%	695 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	14.21	17.90	−21%	655 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	14.34	17.58	−18%	697 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	15.12	18.88	−20%	660 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	14.44	20.22	−29%	517 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.