Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC AJACCIO

IMO: 9605267
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 49,659 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.82 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 72,222 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

347

Container median 178 kg/nm (+95%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−22%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

132.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,970 t

CO₂ emitted

62,275 t

Distance sailed

57,562 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,622 h

151 days, 41% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 269 kg/nm · median 177 (+52%)

78.8Ranks 1,795 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 75% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+4%)

7.22Ranks 1,148 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU37%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,222 t

6.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC AJACCIO
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC AJACCIO
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC AJACCIO
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−25%	−27%	+110%	+43%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.6 kn	+18%	+42%	−70%	−9%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.2 kn	−12%	−30%	−16%	−13%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−3%	−10%	−1%	+5%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+9%	+5%	+15%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.9 kn	+12%	+84%	+83%	−5%	6.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.2 kn	−9%	−38%	−58%	+5%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A	8,177	25,498	30,418	2,043	14.9	269	16.9	–
2024	COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A	5,206	16,246	14,490	947	15.3	359	11.8	–
2023	not published	14,661	45,689	48,077	3,779	12.7	305	13.0	–
2022	not published	19,970	62,275	57,562	3,622	15.9	347	15.0	–
2021	not published	20,850	64,965	58,110	3,409	17.0	359	14.2	–
2020	not published	16,663	51,976	50,553	2,858	17.7	330	14.3	–
2019	not published	8,087	25,224	27,600	2,550	10.8	293	15.1	–
2018	not published	20,932	65,252	64,964	4,062	16.0	322	14.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A	16.9	16.3	+4%	1,148 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024	COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A	11.8	17.5	−32%	590 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	13.0	19.4	−33%	600 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	15.0	19.1	−22%	695 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	14.2	17.9	−21%	655 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	14.3	17.6	−18%	697 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	15.1	18.9	−20%	660 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	14.4	20.2	−29%	517 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.